false
Catalog
2021 AOSSM-AANA Combined Annual Meeting Recordings
Surgical Outcomes after Bucket Handle Meniscus Rep ...
Surgical Outcomes after Bucket Handle Meniscus Repairs: Analysis of a Large, Contained Cohort Study
Back to course
[Please upgrade your browser to play this video content]
Video Transcription
I have no disclosures. This was supported by a Kaiser Permanente Community Benefits Grant. So we're all here about the meniscus. We all know the meniscus is a shock absorber. It augments joint congruity. It provides joint lubrication. It contributes to proprioceptive feedback and mechanisms. And all that combined decreases the tibial femoral stress. Meniscus tears come in different shapes and sizes. We've already heard about meniscal roots. They're hard to generalize. You can't just do a research study on all meniscus tears. The purpose of our study was to use bucket-handle tears as a proxy for large vertical tears. They comprise about 10% of all meniscal tears and are often more of a surgical urgency due to their mechanical symptoms, most often locking of the knee. There is a talk later on about we shouldn't be doing as many meniscus repairs, but as sports physicians, I think we're all in the state of the meniscus society. And as such, we should know our outcomes of how these repairs do. There have been small studies focused on bucket-handle tears. Small number of patients, 24, 75, around the 20% failure or re-tear rate. There's been a recent systematic review that looked at 15 studies with 700 plus patients. And they had almost 30% failure rate, specifically focusing on all-in-side repairs. So we decided to use our Kaiser Permanente Northern California Electronic Patient Database. This is a capture patient population. We use natural language processing to look for the term bucket and handle in CPD-coded meniscus repair surgeries. And then to ensure selection accuracy, we did perform a random sample analysis on 3%. This is our flowchart. We had about 7,000 patients who had a CPT code of a meniscus repair. If they had any prior history of a meniscus repair or a meniscectomy, we excluded them. The natural language had to catch bucket and handle in the op notes. So if they did, they were included. They needed to have an MRI within 60 days prior to the procedure. We excluded people who were too young or too old. They had to have an active Kaiser membership one year prior to the procedure and after the procedure. And then we excluded any surgeries that had a concomitant meniscectomy coded along with the meniscus repair. So that ended up with our patient population of 1,359 patients at a mean age of 24 years. 44% of them underwent a concomitant ACL reconstruction at the time of the meniscus repair. And we had a little over a four-year average follow-up time. Subsequent knee surgeries were performed in 20% of the patients. And this is our survival curve. Of those 20%, 4% had a repeat meniscus repair and 12% had a repeat meniscectomy or a subsequent meniscectomy after the initial repair. We did a multivariate analysis and the green areas were risk factors that protected against a subsequent surgery. So if you're Asian, congrats. Thank you all. If you had a concomitant ACL reconstruction, you were also protected against subsequent surgeries. If you were younger, 12 to 18 or 19 to 30 years old, or if you were at a lower BMI, those are risk factors for actually having subsequent surgeries. Obviously, there's limitations to this study. This is a large database study. We weren't able to get patient-reported outcomes for such a large population or any other data that's not accessible by electronic data review. We're not able to comment on certain factors that may affect the success of the bucket handle repair, whether it's a medial or lateral-sided bucket tear, how old the tear was. We did have MRIs, but as you guys all know, there could be chronic tears that get MRIs that you end up fixing. Tear size, we're obviously not able to ascertain, but the fact that they were bucket handle tears means they were large tears. And then the technique, whether it's all inside, inside out, and the repair device used. So in conclusion, younger age and lower BMI increase the risk of subsequent surgical procedures after bucket handle tears. The need for a concomitant ACL reconstruction decreases the risk of subsequent procedures. And reoperation following the initial bucket handle repair is about 20% of the patient population and is three times more likely to have a meniscectomy than a revision meniscus repair. Thank you.
Video Summary
The speaker discusses the importance of the meniscus as a shock absorber and its role in joint health. They specifically focus on bucket-handle tears, which comprise 10% of meniscal tears and often require surgical intervention due to locking of the knee. Previous studies have shown a high failure rate for repairs of bucket-handle tears, so the speaker aims to analyze outcomes using their patient database. They assess 1,359 patients who underwent meniscus repair and found that 20% required subsequent knee surgeries. Factors protective against subsequent surgeries include younger age, lower BMI, and concomitant ACL reconstruction. Bucket-handle repairs had a higher likelihood of resulting in meniscectomies rather than revision repairs.
Asset Caption
David Ding, MD
Keywords
meniscus
bucket-handle tears
surgical intervention
subsequent knee surgeries
meniscectomies
×
Please select your language
1
English