AOSSM 2022 Annual Meeting Recordings - no CME-Defining Clinically Significant Outcomes After Gluteus Medius Repair at 5-Years

Defining Clinically Significant Outcomes After Gluteus Medius Repair at 5-Years

Video Transcription

Video Summary

In this video, the presenter discusses the findings of a study on defining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PAS) after endoscopic gluteus medius repair at a minimum of five-year follow-up. The study concludes that endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tears results in improved patient-reported outcomes, pain scores, and hip abduction strength in the short-term. It also shows similar outcomes to open repair with fewer complications. The presenter goes on to discuss the study's methodology, patient demographics, and the achievement of MCID and PAS for different outcome measures. The study concludes that patients achieve clinically significant outcomes with excellent survivorship at five years post-operatively. No threshold value for PAS was recommended for pain.

Asset Caption

Morgan Rice, MD

Keywords

endoscopic gluteus medius repair

minimal clinically important difference

patient acceptable symptom state

patient-reported outcomes

hip abduction strength