false
Home
2023 AOSSM Annual Meeting Recordings with CME
Case Discussion: ACL Repair vs. ACL Reconstruction ...
Case Discussion: ACL Repair vs. ACL Reconstruction - Indications and Controversies
Back to course
[Please upgrade your browser to play this video content]
Video Transcription
Video Summary
In this video, a panel of experts discusses the topic of ACL repair versus reconstruction. They begin by mentioning the focus on good to excellent tissue quality and proximal tears in the early literature on primary reconstruction. However, they note that systematic reviews have shown no significant difference in outcomes between repair and reconstruction, which is promising for the potential of repair. The panel discusses the use of scaffolds and bare constructs in ACL repair, emphasizing the importance of having a backup plan in case repair is not possible. The panel members share their thoughts on different types of tears and how they factor in decision-making, as well as the importance of tissue quality and reducibility during surgery. They also discuss the role of remnant sparing and the potential benefits of preserving native tissue in ACL surgery. The panel concludes by highlighting the importance of assessing outcomes, including functional measures and MRI evaluations, and considering the long-term goal of mitigating osteoarthritis. Overall, the panel provides insights on the current understanding and considerations in the debate between ACL repair and reconstruction. (Transcript sourced from YouTube video titled "ACL Repair: What We Know in 2023" by Dr. Scott Dye)
Asset Caption
Asheesh Bedi, MD
Keywords
ACL repair
ACL reconstruction
tissue quality
proximal tears
scaffolds
bare constructs
×
Please select your language
1
English