2022 AOSSM Annual Meeting Recordings with CME-Defining Clinically Significant Outcomes After Gluteus Medius Repair at 5-Years

Defining Clinically Significant Outcomes After Gluteus Medius Repair at 5-Years

Video Transcription

Video Summary

This video summarizes findings on the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) after endoscopic gluteus medius repair at a minimum five-year follow-up. The study found that endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tears leads to improved patient-reported outcomes, pain scores, and hip abduction strength in the short term. It also suggests that endoscopic repair has similar outcomes to open repair with fewer complications. The video presents research on two groups of patients who underwent endoscopic gluteus medius repair and showed significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes at five years. The study defined MCID and PASS thresholds for various outcome measures and achieved high rates of both. The video concludes that patients achieved positive clinically significant outcomes with excellent survivorship rates.

Asset Caption

Morgan Rice, MD

Keywords

minimal clinically important difference

patient acceptable symptom state

endoscopic gluteus medius repair

patient-reported outcomes

hip abduction strength